A Libertarian is an Anarchist who votes” –Augustus Esterhazy ..

AS SECTION 245 OF THE COMMONWEALTH ELECTORAL ACT 1918 IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AS TO COMPEL A PERSON TO VOTE, I FOR THIS SPECIFICALLY REFUSE TO VOTE.
An unconstitutional law is no law at all!

Politicians bully people into voting and I took a stand against that and refused to vote while being a candidate in each election. In the coming election I will again refuse to vote!

Anyone who think that the judge was a push over ignored the thousands upon thousands of pages of material I relied upon, including a book on CD I had published!

Despite that the High Court in previous cases had ruled that voting is compulsory I prove the High Court to be wrong and the lawyers were certainly not going to try me further where I had overwhelmingly evidence to prove my case.
Lawyers learn how to manipulate legislation in favour of their clients but I, as a “CONSTITUTIONALIST” was the master on constitutional issues and they could not defeat me.
The cases are to complicated to set out in a post, hence my books reveal it all.
See also my website http://www.schorel-hlavka.com and my blog http://au.360.yahoo.com/profile-ijpxwMQ4dbXm0BMADq1lv8AYHknTV_QH

GHSH is lucky in his choice of magistrate; if more people tried it, they would close the loophole, and make it mandatory

There is no loophole. Magistrates throw out cases on a whim quite regularly. Voting is still mandatory – trust me.

In my personal opinion the English Bill of Rights is badly written, full of gaping holes and generally pathetic in a modern sense. The closest we’ve ever come to getting it right is the US Bill of Rights which in my opinion is 90% of the way there (probably need some protection for free trade and limitations on the federal government, plus some other smaller stuff and rewordings).

You proved no such thing. A single magistrate merely decided not to convict you.

If you had “proved” that compulsory voting was ultra vires the constitution, nobody would now be required to vote. That’s obviously not the case – try it again and see what happens. Encourage others not to vote and see what happens. Big Brother will come after you and the constitution won’t save you.

the bill of rights is as much part of the Australian constitution as it is in the US Constitution!

Complete and utter garbage. The US Bill of Rights applies to the US, not Australia. We have no Bill of Rights. We also have almost no rights embedded in our constitution.

I proved on constitutional grounds that there was no constitutional powers to compel anyone to vote! No change of law was required as the legislation purporting it to be compulsotry is ULTRA VIRES (WITHOUT LEGAL FORCE)

Consider the following;
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows:
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.
Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it. . .
A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.
No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence
Second Edition, 1998 version, Section 203 (formerly Section 256)

As for no rights inb the Constitution, they are EMBEDDED in it, just that it is not particularly known to people as they are , so to say, brainwashed by whatever political party is in power. the bill of rights is as much part of the Australian constitution as it is in the US Constitution!