Victorian 2am lockout protest
It’s fun to go to a protest where there are signs that urge people to “SAY NO TO THE NANNY STATE”. A less convincing sign that was displayed at last night’s protest against Victoria’s new 2am lockout was one that pictorially argued that Saddam Hussein = John Brumby, implying that the former Iraqi dictator was, in fact, a better than average Labor premier.

Crappy phone camera shot: crowd gathers at Treasury Gardens at about 5:30pm.
There was a degree of success yesterday before the protest: some forty-seven licencees were granted temporary exemptions to the 2am rule. However, they had to agree to some fairly onerous extra regulations, such as doubling their security, and agreeing not to advertise or promote the fact that they were open for new customers after 2am. This could provide a compromise position for the licencees and government to agree on, but the government has indicated that it wants to push on with the lockout regardless.
Brumby is playing up the effect drunken violence has on ruining lives. Sure, but there doesn’t seem to be much evidence to suggest that a lockout is the correct policy solution. Three people were stabbed in brawls in the city last night. But conspiciously, they were stabbed before midnight – a 2am lockout would have no effect on this incident. It’s hard not to agree with another placard held up last night: “POLICE NOT POLICY”

My IPA colleague, Tim Wilson in the centre of the photo whips up the crowd with his blue megaphone. When he told a reporter that he was from the Institute of Public Affairs, the reporter was pretty confused.
The media has reported about 3000 people turned up to the protest – that seems about right to me, but I’m hardly a protest veteran. Having marched to the Victorian parliament (30 minutes before the organisers actually wanted them to) the speeches when we got there were unfortunately a bit lacklustre. One speaker, a Greens candidate for (I presume) the Gippsland byelection made the strange decision to focus his five minute speech on windfarms and carbon emissions, rather than liquour licences.
Outside the Victorian Parliament.
Members of the Socialist Party were handing out flyers when we turned up that maintained that the key issue with the lockout was war, racism and capitalism. Most of my IPA colleagues were smart enough not to take one – I absentmindedly accepted the flyer because I was distracted looking to get a NO 2AM badge. No dice, unfortunately.
But for the most part, the protest did well to keep on message. I don’t think the vast majority of those who attended were otherwise politically-minded – the idea of a late-night lockout offends a lot of people who hold no strong views on baby bonuses, FuelWatch and infrastructure spending. It would be great if more of these people could become activated in a libertarian direction, but I’m sadly skeptical.
Certainly the Liberal Party missed the opportunity to push an anti-Brumby message – imposing a late-night lockout was, embarrassingly, a key Liberal policy for the last election. Still, the chance to take sides with both partiers (by opposing the lockout) and law-and-order folks (by demanding more police on the streets) against the Labor government was depressingly, and, to my mind foolishly, discarded.
The protest was worth it, but it was hardly a massive blow for liberty – the issue now rests with the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
Crossposted at www.chrisberg.org.
The LDP Contests Gippsland By-Election
This is an appeal for support by LDP Treasurer, David Leyonhjelm.
Australia’s only libertarian political party, the LDP, has nominated a candidate in the Gippsland by-election on 28 June 2008.
The candidate is well known local identity Ben Buckley. Ben is a libertarian based on first principles. To him it is obvious that Australians pay far too much tax and Governments are too authoritarian and intrusive. However, he has never previously been involved in libertarian politics. For many years Ben was co-owner and Chief Pilot of Alpine Aviation, involved in crop dusting plus emergency Medivacs and mercy flights. At 71, he is still involved in the provision of fire spotting services and general aviation.
Ben’s early years were spent in contract deer culling in New Zealand, where he also learnt to fly. His fame and skill as a pilot spread and one of Ben’s major achievements was flying an ultra-light aircraft from Australia to New Zealand. Ben’s adventures and anecdotes around his flying, disputes with Aviation Department bureaucracy and community activities are contained in the book ‘Buckley’s Chance”, published in 1998.
Ben has always been a staunch supporter of the timber industry as well as pushing for better access to the bush by four-wheel drivers and hunters. His passion for community issues led him to enter local government and he is now in his second term as a Councillor with East Gippsland Shire Council. Prior to its amalgamation he spent 12 years as a Councillor with Omeo Shire, including one term as President.
Ben has a strong local following as a result of his involvement in local government and previous candidacy as an independent candidate. While winning the seat is not that likely, with the LDP’s help he could really make a mark and catapult the party into the mainstream.
LDP members and supporters can assist Ben’s campaign in the form of money or time (or both). Donations up to $1500 are tax deductible and can by made by direct bank transfer, credit card, cheque or Paypal. See the LDP’s website or contact LDP Treasurer David Leyonhjelm on treasurer (AT) ldp.org.au for details.
Physical assistance with the campaign can take various forms. Options include letterboxing prior to the election and handing out leaflets on election day. Contact LDP President Peter Whelan at president (AT) ldp.org.au or (02) 9652 0415 if you can help.
Discussion of the Gippsland campaign can be found on the LDP’s blog.
NRL – Abolish The Salary Cap
Canterbury Bulldogs star, Sonny Bill Williams, wants more money. He is currently in the first year of a five year deal with the Bulldogs worth $400,000 a season. He says he is being underpaid.
He is right.
The NRL is starting to lose players to European clubs, not so heavily constrained by such meagre salaries. The wages and sponsorship of Williams, Gasnier, Lockyer et al, on the other hand, are kept artificially low by the NRL salary cap of $4.1mm per club. Williams supports the cap but wants the chance to earn more via sponsorship. This, the NRL correctly replied, is effectively the same as raising the salary cap.
NRL introduced a salary cap in the early 1990s with the laudable goal of increasing competition amongst the League’s teams. Who, goes the thinking, would want to watch a League in which only the richest three or four clubs stood a chance of winning?
Well, half the population of the U.K. for a start. The British Premiership is such a League and you’ll not find any salary caps here. In fact Christiano Ronaldo is currently negotiating a new contract with Man United worth $15mm in wages alone, three times as much as the entire Bulldogs squad combined. At the start of each Premiership season, everyone knows that only Man United, Chelsea and Arsenal have a chance of winning (i’m sorry Liverpool fans – it ain’t going to happen). The rest are there solely to make up the numbers. Hence fan attendance has plummeted and ticket prices are being slashed to try and bring back the fans.
Except it hasn’t and they aren’t. Read more »
Libertarian conferences
For the jet-setters among you — there are a couple of international libertarian conferences coming up. One in Europe and the other in America.
Conference organiser Mikolaj Barczentewicz asked me to pass on this invitation to the European get-together – which can be found here. The conference will be in Warsaw (Poland) from June 28-29, and has the support of Libertarian International.
The other libertarian get-together is FreedomFest, being held in Las Vegas, Nevada from July 10-12. The ALS did get an invite to participate, but it’s unlikely that we’ll be able to send over a delegation. If you would like to go over and waive the ALS flag, please contact me.
Compulsory Voting
This is a guest post by Philip Lillingstone.
You can find more information on this subject on his website, www.compulsoryvoting.org, but no further pictures of Paris Hilton.
Of all the reasons given to us why Australia (and the exceedingly few other countries that have compulsory voting) should retain it, I think the most spurious one is the one that informs us we ‘have a duty to vote’.
In times past when Australia was at war, women with white feathers might approach able bodied men on the street who were not in uniform, to suggest to them that they should heed a call of duty to their country. We are supposed to believe today is that each citizen similarly has a patriotic duty to his fatherland/motherland to do his ‘bit’ by making that great sacrifice and proceeding to the ballot box.
The fallacy of this argument I believe, is that of semantics. It would hardly be a stretch to define duty as an obligation to undertake a tangible service. We may be happy to perform our various duties but that does not belie the fact that the very nature of a duty is to do something primarily defined as that which the receiving party views as having value. Whether it be to give someone comfort in times of distress, to pay monies to the national revenue or take up arms in times of war. We may joke with our friends by declaring that the reason we are helping ourselves to the hot chips on their plates is because of our duty to test their food for poison, but in reality, an act done for self indulgence that can in no way benefit anyone else, can simply never be described as a duty. Read more »
How Should Mr. Tanner Cut Spending?
Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner has admitted that the government has run out of ideas on how to cut spending. Round 2 is up to you, dear readers. Let’s rise up to the challenge laid down by Mr. Tanner,
‘We would welcome any suggestions or savings proposals from anybody in the general community’.
As a reminder, here’s a paper from the Treasury on how the government managed to piss $272 billion up against the wall this year. They also note with concern that real spending has increased by a whopping 50% in the past ten years despite ten years of strong economic growth and that ‘all other things being the same, higher government spending will reduce economic growth.’
Social security and welfare……$96.5bn
Health……………………………….$43bn
General ……………………………..$32bn
Defence …………………………….$20bn
Education ………………………….$18bn
Transport & Infrastructure ……$10bn
Industry …………………………….$10bn
Culture ……………………………..$6bn
GST payments to States………..$36bn
Total ………………………………..$272bn
Send in your finest proposals, we’ll put the best ones up for a vote and then mail them direct to Mr. Tanner.
