They got one thing right
… and it wasn’t the bit about renewables.
16 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
-
Recent Comments
Catallaxy Files- What caused the recessions in Europe, Asia and Australia? February 8, 2012It is the middle of the night but cannot sleep so I have been reading Thomas E. Wood’s Meltdown which is a very interesting discussion of the causes of the Global Financial Crisis. Wood is trying to demonstrate that the GFC here in the US was caused by government interference in the housing market but [...]Steve Kates
- Property rights and revenue models February 8, 2012I’m sure everyone has heard about the Optus copyright ruling. The Federal Court has ruled Optus is not breaching copyright by allowing customers to watch sporting matches shown on free-to-air TV on a short delay through its mobile TV Now service. What Optus have done is effectively sell remote access to your video recorder. People [...]Sinclair Davidson
- Stephen v Stephen: University quality February 8, 2012A bit of a spat has broken out between Stephen King and Stephen Matchett. King is the soon to be former Dean of Business at Monash University and Matchett is a higher education analyst at The Australian. It started with this post and conclusion. Unfortunately, unlike universities in many countries, Australian higher education has become [...]Sinclair Davidson
- What caused the recessions in Europe, Asia and Australia? February 8, 2012
- inCISe
- Auto industry privileges are irresponsible February 8, 2012A program of perpetual subsidies for any industry is both economically irresponsible and morally unfair. Over the past weeks, there has been a resurgence of protectionist rhetoric and anticompetitive industry policy. Under the rationale of preserving a domestic manufacturing sector and saving local jobs, the federal government has renewed its assistance for […]Alexander Philipatos
- Dr Hartwich ‘economist extraordinaire’ February 6, 2012All tickets have sold for tonight’s fiscal talk by Oliver Marc Hartwich. He will address Europe’s mess some call the economy, and look at the growing opportunities available in Asia for Australia. If you were unlucky and didn’t secure a ticket, don’t fret, a full video recording of the talk will be availabe in the coming days. In the […]Editor
- Time to drop the Dick February 5, 2012Flanked by five busty blondes and a chihuahua, ex-entrepreneur Dick Smith created a media stir in August 2010 when he announced an award of $1 million for the brightest idea to stop population growth and find an alternative to economic growth. The competition was open to anyone under the age of 30 and due to be awarded within 12 months. A year and a half lat […]Oliver Marc Hartwich
- Auto industry privileges are irresponsible February 8, 2012
- IPA news
- Scientific research drowning in a sea of alarmism February 6, 2012Last week, almost 400 people attended a public meeting in Newcastle to learn about the scientific evidence that underpins...
- Who'll drag us free of our heavy debt burden? February 2, 2012While most Australians were tanning themselves at the beach during their summer breaks, the federal opposition and the...
- Renewable energy rules lose traction January 31, 2012Energy policy in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries is spurred by concerns that gas...
- Scientific research drowning in a sea of alarmism February 6, 2012
[...] for Get Up (more failed socialist economics), but as Terje over at Thoughts on Freedom points out, they got one thing right. [...]
Pingback by skepticlawyer » Pointless populism, parts #3 & 17 | June 19, 2008
Get Up is just a front for Labor normally, so this is refreshing.
Didn’t they have candidates in the senate in the last election?
>> Get Up is just a front for Labor normally, so this is refreshing.
What a load of crap!
Yes GetUp are a bunch of socialists, but I think there’s room for a libertarian version of them.
It could be called HandsOff!, like GetUp! it would be non-partisan, but would campaign against givernment regulation, interference, and nanny statism.
James, you are kidding yourself if you think GetUp isn’t a labour front.
I don’t think GetUp are a Labor front, at least not explicitly. I would call them more of a socialist front.
They probably have a few Labor people in there, but I reckon many more would be Greens and Socialist Alliance supporters.
They campaigned pretty hard for Labor in the leadup to the election because they hated Howard, but now Rudd’s in he’s not socialist enough for them.
People here seeing GetUp through left-right, capitalist-socialist, lib-lab, libertarian-interventionist prisms are sprouting the kinds of C20 nonsense that has got us as far up shit creek as we are.
All we’ve seen here is rational video, timely and well-made, from an organisation that is is more issues-based than ideological and (relatively) more bottom-up than top-down.
Just because GetUp is bottom-up and issues-based, doesn’t mean they don’t hold political positions that can be identified. They have clearly and consistently supported policies which involve more government involvement and a distrust of voluntary coordination. That means they are interventionist. It is therefore not surprising that many GetUp members are Green/ALP supporters.
While a libertarian version would be nice, there aren’t enough libertarians. It’s difficult enough to fill up a few groups and one political party… let alone proposing that we spread our efforts even thinner. If libertarians want to help they should support a current group, not create yet another micro-group.
While a libertarian version would be nice, there aren’t enough libertarians. It’s difficult enough to fill up a few groups and one political party…
Comment by Temujin | June 21, 2008
I reckon you’d be surprised if you got out there and spread the message a bit more. You might find a fair few who are libertarians without knowing it.
Here you need to take a leaf from Getup’s book.
It’s ironic really, for an organisation that generally opposes the marketing practices of corporates (and possibly marketing in general as a tool of capitalism), the one thing that GetUp does quite well is market itself.
I think GetUp are probably best defined as a political activism group who aim to get leftist governments in power and keep them in power, while continuing to lobby them for their own pet causes.
This makes them in practice, if not in theory, a Labor front.
There probably is room for a libertarian version of GetUp though. I’d join that.
There probably is room for a libertarian version of GetUp though. I’d join that.
Ahem. The LDP?
How is Ben Buckley going in the Gippsland by-election, BTW?
Thanks David, but I’m thinking groups that have political interests but are independent of the political process.
In order to agitate for smaller government, and for greater responsibility by individual citizens for their freedoms, beyond the demands of the welfare state, I think it is necessary to have individuals working outside the political process. There’s no point in fighting for greater freedom from an interventionist government if no-one does anything with that freedom.
[...] at the demand for petrol, while Terje Petersen and various others love the GetUp YouTube video on Rudd’s FuelWatch scheme.Should small-l liberals defect to the ALP? Mark Bahnisch is [...]
Pingback by Club Troppo » Missing Link Daily | July 22, 2008