ALS: thoughts on freedom

Australian Libertarian Society Blog

Private Internet Filtering

The federal governments move toward a national compulsory internet filter is misguided. However I suspect that it does tap into a genuine concern held in certain quarters of the Australian community. The solution is not a single, mandatory, government run filter, but a system of privately operated filters that cater to specific situations. In my house we filter internet content and protect the kiddies using a free service provided by OpenDNS.com. The criteria used by OpenDNS for what should be blocked and what should not be blocked is based on a number of classifications (eg Adult Sex, Videos, Games) which you can choose to block or allow. The community of OpenDNS users provides continuous feedback on how sites should or shouldn’t be classified.

McDonalds have also helped to pave the way forward in announcing that their free wireless Internet service will hence forth be filtered.

McDonalds will be deploying earthwave’s Clean Pipes service to make the internet “Family Friendly” for its 1.45 million customers per day who use the Telstra Next-IP Wi-Fi hotspots in its 720 stores, the company said in a statement today.

The system uses firewalls, network intrusion prevention systems, distributed denial of service protection and other web protection mechanisms.

It will block sites which contain content considered not family friendly such as pornography or bomb-making information. It will use a URL listing service to do that, but McDonald’s also has the ability to place sites it believes to be inappropriate on its black list.

Whilst ISPs rightly lament the governments initative in this area they could move quicker to provide workable solutions of their own. If the government is in a hurry to get results it would be better off providing incentives to the private sector rather than seeking to lock us all in to one single ubiquitous centralised compulstory solution.

Feel free to tell us about your favourite filtering solution in the comments.

October 29, 2008 Posted by | Politics | 34 Comments

Bargain hunters seeking better government

An international survey by KPMG suggests that a more mobile global workforce is bargain hunting for a better deal from governments.

“Top rate personal income tax rates around the world have fallen by an average of 2.5 percent in the past six years, as governments strive to balance their need for revenue with the impact of increasing global labor mobility, a new study from KPMG International has found.”

And the effect on income tax appears to be encouraging even if modest.

Of the 87 countries surveyed, 33 have cut their rates in the past six years and only seven have a higher top rate in 2008 than they did in 2003.

However Australia might still need to lift it’s game.

“Australia also cut its personal tax rate by two points to 45 percent last year,” said Rosheen Garnon, head of KPMG’s International Executive Services practice and a partner in the Australian firm, “but if the intention was to attract back high value Australian workers who have temporarily moved to Hong Kong or Singapore, it may not be enough. It is common to hear from foreign workers that once families have become accustomed to the huge increase in spending and saving power that low tax rates provide, it can be very difficult to justify going home.”

October 29, 2008 Posted by | General | 3 Comments

New US Bill of Rights

Hat tip to NRO’s “The Corner” blog for this election coverage:

U.S. Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D. Toledo) whipped the crowd up before Mr. Obama took the stage yesterday telling them that America needed a Second Bill of Rights guaranteeing all Americans a job, health care, homes, an education, and a fair playing field for business and farmers.

In short, the right to coercion of other people and to redistributed wealth.  Sadly, it’s this sort of thinking that makes me wary of any movement on a bill of rights in Australia – even though I believe we could certainly benefit from some constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.  By “fair playing field for business and farmers,” he no doubt means government assistance and protection from the “evils” of free market competition.

As a reader from The Corner points out, these rights were guaranteed in another country’s constitution:

Article 40. Citizens of the USSR have the right to work…

Article 41. Citizens of the USSR have the right to rest and leisure…

Article 42. Citizens of the USSR have the right to health protection…

Article 44. Citizens of the USSR have the rights to housing…

Article 45. Citizens of the USSR have the right to education…

October 29, 2008 Posted by | General | 28 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 100 other followers