<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Private Internet Filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/</link>
	<description>Australian Libertarian Society Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ABDULLAH</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-72861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ABDULLAH]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-72861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks for sharing this info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for sharing this info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proxor</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-58226</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Proxor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-58226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Found a lot of useful information on your blog.
Thanks for sharing!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Found a lot of useful information on your blog.<br />
Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerjeP (say tay-a)</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55325</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TerjeP (say tay-a)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amir - ironically my home internet filter blocked my access to Tor. So much for that theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amir &#8211; ironically my home internet filter blocked my access to Tor. So much for that theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amir</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.torproject.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tor&lt;/a&gt; will allow people to get through it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.torproject.org/" rel="nofollow">Tor</a> will allow people to get through it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papachango</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[papachango]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Getting back on topic, check the difference in the Age and the Herald Sun&#039;s handling of the same issue:

Age:
&lt;b&gt;Internet screening move hits hurdle&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;A headline-grabbing election promise to crack down on internet nasties looks to be in trouble as Senate opposition grows&lt;/i&gt;

Herald Sun:
&lt;b&gt;Australia to implement mandatory internet censorship&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;i&gt;AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.&lt;/i&gt;

Differet spin or what? The Hun might be a bit sensationalist, but it&#039;s more on the mark.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting back on topic, check the difference in the Age and the Herald Sun&#8217;s handling of the same issue:</p>
<p>Age:<br />
<b>Internet screening move hits hurdle</b><br />
<i>A headline-grabbing election promise to crack down on internet nasties looks to be in trouble as Senate opposition grows</i></p>
<p>Herald Sun:<br />
<b>Australia to implement mandatory internet censorship</b><br />
<i>AUSTRALIA will join China in implementing mandatory censoring of the internet under plans put forward by the Federal Government.</i></p>
<p>Differet spin or what? The Hun might be a bit sensationalist, but it&#8217;s more on the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: papachango</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55314</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[papachango]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Temujin - 

What you&#039;re saying is that an environmentalist party could also be somewhat libertarian. I agree, it&#039;s possible, though most environmentalists go for more regulation as a way to achieve their goals.

However, In spite of their name, I&#039;m not convinced that the Greens Party are primarily an environmentalist party. They spend more time campaigning for the rights of asylum seekers and people accused of terrorism than they do on the environment.

Moving towards ecomonic liberty would run counter to one of their four pillars - the principle of &#039;social justice&#039; (by which they mean socialism by a better-sounding name)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temujin &#8211; </p>
<p>What you&#8217;re saying is that an environmentalist party could also be somewhat libertarian. I agree, it&#8217;s possible, though most environmentalists go for more regulation as a way to achieve their goals.</p>
<p>However, In spite of their name, I&#8217;m not convinced that the Greens Party are primarily an environmentalist party. They spend more time campaigning for the rights of asylum seekers and people accused of terrorism than they do on the environment.</p>
<p>Moving towards ecomonic liberty would run counter to one of their four pillars &#8211; the principle of &#8216;social justice&#8217; (by which they mean socialism by a better-sounding name)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Temujin</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55309</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Temujin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 04:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is simply a fact that it is possible for the Greens to move more towards economic liberty. I doubt they will. But it&#039;s simply a fact that they could.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is simply a fact that it is possible for the Greens to move more towards economic liberty. I doubt they will. But it&#8217;s simply a fact that they could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerjeP (say tay-a)</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TerjeP (say tay-a)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Temujin is somewhat right if we are talking about greens but not as correct if we are talking about The Australian Greens. The former is a movement the latter is a political party with significant political capital invested in the ideologies of socialism. I think the movement has more room to move than the political party, and it was the political party that my link and exclaimation made reference to. I was quite explicit in naming the party not the movement. 

In observing the New Zealand election the interesting things I note is that ACT, the nearest equivalent to the LDP in Australia, sells their green credentials pretty hard (except on the issue of CO2). And at the same time the New Zealand Greens are promoting tax cuts (as is pretty much every New Zealand party in one form or another).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Temujin is somewhat right if we are talking about greens but not as correct if we are talking about The Australian Greens. The former is a movement the latter is a political party with significant political capital invested in the ideologies of socialism. I think the movement has more room to move than the political party, and it was the political party that my link and exclaimation made reference to. I was quite explicit in naming the party not the movement. </p>
<p>In observing the New Zealand election the interesting things I note is that ACT, the nearest equivalent to the LDP in Australia, sells their green credentials pretty hard (except on the issue of CO2). And at the same time the New Zealand Greens are promoting tax cuts (as is pretty much every New Zealand party in one form or another).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John

take a look at the Green party manifesto. the striking thing is that it isn&#039;t a green grouping. they are basically hardcore socialists.

Funnily enough the green policy section is actually a small part of what they subscribe to.

The fact that they are against Rudd&#039;s Great wall is neither here or there. In other words we shouldn&#039;t be doing a song and dance simply because one of the bingo numbers came up. They are too far gone to even worry about as a party.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John</p>
<p>take a look at the Green party manifesto. the striking thing is that it isn&#8217;t a green grouping. they are basically hardcore socialists.</p>
<p>Funnily enough the green policy section is actually a small part of what they subscribe to.</p>
<p>The fact that they are against Rudd&#8217;s Great wall is neither here or there. In other words we shouldn&#8217;t be doing a song and dance simply because one of the bingo numbers came up. They are too far gone to even worry about as a party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Fryar</title>
		<link>http://blog.libertarian.org.au/2008/10/29/private-internet-filtering/#comment-55282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Fryar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alsblog.wordpress.com/?p=1689#comment-55282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can see your point Temujin but I am inclined towards Fleeced at 17. The only thing stopping them becoming laissez faire is that it is easier to suck up to the representatives of the state to get what you want rammed down the throats of the population, than to persuade logical people that your idea is valid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see your point Temujin but I am inclined towards Fleeced at 17. The only thing stopping them becoming laissez faire is that it is easier to suck up to the representatives of the state to get what you want rammed down the throats of the population, than to persuade logical people that your idea is valid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

