Comments on: The hater strikes again

By: G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:47:09 +0000

Ok typo error “paer” should read “paper”.

By: G. H. Schorel-Hlavka

G. H. Schorel-Hlavka — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 12:45:21 +0000

While I too may not understand economics on the otherhand without even reading your paer on carbon tax I can state it is utter and sheer nonsense because I am a CONSTITUTIONALIST and there is no constitutional powers for the Commonwealth to misuse taxation powers to interfere with State legislative powers such as environment. Economist or not if you do not understand the basic constitutional powers then your entiore paper is a sheer wast of effort!

By: Insofbowsox

Insofbowsox — Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:16:13 +0000

side effects of viagra and nitrates
While I confidence in some of this article may if possible be a youthful utmost, there are indeed some tolerably valid points here
http://enzytexposed.com/healthy/heart-attack-diseases-you-should-be-aware-of

By: Mangled Thoughts » Professor Sinclair Davidson, Institute for Public Affairs, Centre for Independent Studies

Fri, 03 Jul 2009 08:54:00 +0000

[...] The hater strikes again [...]

By: The last gasp of a fading fool « Thoughts on Freedom

The last gasp of a fading fool « Thoughts on Freedom — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:35:22 +0000

[...] his latest rambling rant Gerry tries to defend his monetary confusion. And fails [...]

By: Greg Byrne

Greg Byrne — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:03:09 +0000

I think that these are very serious issues that need to be debated. I don’t know which side is right but I do know that if they are not properly debated we will finish up with a highly interventionist policy.

Brookes News has an open invitation to anyone to debate the issues on its site. It’s not about personal abuse or stabbing in the back but debating the issues.

If John Humphreys or Sinclair Davidson wish to debate these issues on the Brookes News site they are welcome to do so.

If they are right then they can enjoy the thought of Jackson squirming when uploading the article to his site.

You don’t deal with serious issues just by dismissing them as Des Moore did in relation to the manufacturing issue.

By: TerjeP (say tay-a)

TerjeP (say tay-a) — Sat, 30 May 2009 23:54:48 +0000

p.s. Having said that I don’t have any love for the IMF.

By: TerjeP (say tay-a)

TerjeP (say tay-a) — Sat, 30 May 2009 23:54:27 +0000

I tend to see it the other way around. That once again including gold within SDRs might be a good way (in political terms) to reinstate a monetary role for gold. This is the line the Chinese are pushing.

By: Damian

Damian — Sat, 30 May 2009 17:52:57 +0000

Terje,

Not arguing against notes, electronic cards etc. Just saying units of weight ought ideally to be the units of account if mandated rather than Dollars or Euros etc and the IMF really are despicable and would try to use gold remonetization as an in for establishing gold backed SDR’s.

By: TerjeP (say tay-a)

TerjeP (say tay-a) — Sat, 30 May 2009 13:04:32 +0000

Damian – you can have a global unit of account without a global currency. And whilst I think gold is the obvious choise as a unit of account I still think we should mostly trade using gold denominated currency or such instruments rather than gold itself. Obviously we can do this without fiat currencies but I fully expect that fiat currencies will always occupy a niche.