Libertarian Quiz
Given it is election season and all I thought that you and some of your friends might be trying to figure out what you actually believe. Well don’t sweat it. We at the Libertarian Society have done all the hard work for you. Just answer the questions on the following quiz and we will tell you what you believe and the circumstances under which you believe it.
http://libertarian.org.au/quiz/
Advertisement
July 22, 2010 - Posted by TerjeP (say tay-a) | Philosophy, Politics
10 Comments
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
-
Recent Comments
Libertarians and ele… on Libertarians and elections (an… 
Dom Vasta on Libertarians and elections (an… 
Shem Bennett on Libertarians and elections (an… 
'Nuke' Gray on Libertarians and elections (an… 
Dom Vasta on Libertarians and elections (an… 
TerjeP (say tay-a) on Libertarians and elections (an… 
TerjeP (say tay-a) on Libertarians and elections (an… 
'Nuke' Gray on Libertarians and elections (an… 
Shem Bennett on Libertarians and elections (an… 
Brendan Halfweeg on The Santa Claus Governmen… Libertarian blogs
- Australian classical liberal in DC
- Andrew Norton
- Skeptic Lawyer
- Real World Libertarian
- Extreme Capitalists
- Jarrah Job
- Thinking out loud
- Wackingday
- Bovination
- Andrew Bolt
- Catallaxy Files
- Institutional Economics
- Mothy Press
- Aussienomics
- The Western Lines
- Louise's liberal blog
- Menzies House
- Green Whiskers
- Free-market liberal
- Catallactics Club
- inCISe blog
- The Econ Student
Libertarian groups
Libertarian people
Libertarian politics
Single-issue groups
- Libertus
- Families & Friends for Drug Law Reform
- Eros
- H. R. Nicholls Society
- Samuel Griffith Society
- Independent Contractors of Australia
- Watch on censorship
- Qld council for civil liberties
- NSW Council on civil liberties
- CLASS
- Sporting Shooters Association of Australia
- Australian Privacy Foundation
- Electronic Frontiers Australia
- HEMP embassy
- Daily Reckoning
- Private doctors
Archives
Meta
Catallaxy Files- Open Forum: February 11, 2012 February 10, 2012 Sinclair Davidson
- Not all recessions are caused by the Fed February 10, 2012More middle of the night blogging. My economics is classical. The almost perfect overlay of my own book can be found in a series of notes taken by Nicholas Kaldor at the LSE in 1927-29 from lectures delivered by the great American economist, Allyn Young. These notes were only published around a decade ago but [...]Steve Kates
- Where’s Romney? February 10, 2012It is quite extraordinary to watch the American political process up close. Now, I admit I have been busy and I don’t watch much of the television and do not read a lot of the press. But before I arrived the thing I did want to do was see more of Mitt Romney since from [...]Steve Kates
inCISe- More on PHI rebate means test February 10, 2012When I wrote in Incise yesterday, ‘Rebate should not be means tested,’ I did not expect events to move quite as quickly as they have. The government seems confident it has the numbers to get the means test through. I wouldn’t be surprised if Rob Oakshott and Andrew Wilkie have indeed swallowed the government’s nonsensical arguments, but it will be interestin […]Robert Carling
- Quiggin versus Carling and Kirchner February 9, 2012John Quiggin accuses Robert Carling and I of ‘an appalling breach of elementary standards of research’ for not acknowledging that Alberto Alesina’s work on the effectiveness of fiscal stimulus and consolidations is ‘highly controversial.’ In fact, we referenced Alesina’s work precisely because it has featured so prominently in public debate, including in the […]Stephen Kirchner
- Police going too far February 9, 2012According to an article in the Sydney Morning Herald, police are lecturing parents for letting their children walk to the shops or catch a bus on their own, with senior police saying such incidents will be reported to the Department of Community Services (DOCs) if a child is considered at risk. But when is a child ‘at risk’? One mother was told it was inappr […]Sara Hudson
- More on PHI rebate means test February 10, 2012
IPA news- Let European dogs lie February 9, 2012Australians will be surprised to learn that, apparently, the federal government now has responsibility to help the city of...
- It's time to bring back the thrift February 9, 2012Ted Baillieu plans to shave 3600 jobs from Victoria's bloated public service. The state of Wisconsin in the US, with a...
- We'll huff, we'll puff, we'll blow the budget into surplus February 8, 2012Bill Clinton famously said, "It's the economy, stupid". So it is. Unsuccessful politicians might be inclined to argue,...
- Let European dogs lie February 9, 2012

It’s a good quiz. most people belong to the Libertarian thought process like myself…a former Libertarian Party card holder. Former because the Libertarian Party is stagnate and the growth rate stays in the plus or minus 1K people yearly so as a third party they fail..not to mention their vague platform and elitist “pure” members.
Once you find out you are Libertarian the best thing to do is push Libertarian minded candidates in the Republican party because at least they have a better chance of getting elected and spreading the Libertarian ideal over the restrictive party.
hmmm. According to the quiz I’m further out on the liberal democratic axis than the LDP. Yet I’m far from the most extreme of Libertarians if my little exchange with Brett the anarcho-capitalist a few threads ago is anything to go by.
Not sure the social score for ALP is accurate anymore since with their policies on things like Internet filtering, etc… they’ve actually become more socially authoritarian in recent times.
In fact, I’s day ALP is more nanny-statist than Libs now…
Papa, IIRC the position of the LDP refers to LDP policies and not the views of any particular LDP member. I’m sure quite a few LDP members (e.g. me) are further out than the actual party policies are.
Fleeced: True, but the test can only answer the questions given, I don’t think there is a question about internet filtering so the ALP score won’t change a lot.
I’m further out than the actual policies. I personally think that on any given issue the LDP should be just a bit more liberal than the most liberal of the other parties. On some issues such as tax policy it is actually a lot more liberal than the next most liberal party. It should be advocating a reform agenda that is bold but sellable and on the whole that is what it does. It should be proposing a pure libertarian endpoint that will seem entirely unobtainable to most voters. It is good to lead the pack but if you get too far ahead people can’t see how to follow.
It should NOT be proposing …
Great point Terje, if the Liberals hadn’t made the term liberal stink we could probably claim to be the only real liberals in the contest. Classical liberals in the main have nowhere to go and possibly have fantasies of nuking Abbott and his lot. Hopefully the press will be looking for something more from us than soundbites on sex, and perhaps we can manage to turn the conversation to the ways we will let the people solve the problems of the nation by getting the government off their backs, and the hand of the state off their wallets. We want their eye out of our keyholes as well, but economics and freedom are the issues to pull mainstream voters.
I do not think it’s all crazy. The Liberals are fiscally conservative, but viewed as a liberal on social issues. So I think we should distinguish between social and fiscal issues in the consideration of the parties and their positions. We support limited government libertarians in all aspects. The problem I had with this game is that it has more of an inclination anarchists, of which there are some in the Libertarian Party.