ALS: thoughts on freedom

Australian Libertarian Society Blog

Hung Parliament = More Government, Not Less

Though there’s plenty of healthy cynicism over the notion of a “new paradigm” in Australian politics, there also seems to be an idea doing the rounds that since a hung parliament makes it difficult for legislation to be passed too easily, that it’s good for libertarian principles. Perhaps in some instances this is the case, but if history of the senate has taught us anything, it’s that those who hold the balance simply trade off: “You give me legislation in this area, and I’ll support you on this one.” I find it hard to recall of a time where an independent or minor party candidate ever successfully negotiated less government interference in our daily lives (though I’m happy if someone can point to an example.)

It now seems Tasmanian Independent Andrew Wilkie has decided that his main policy is poker machine reform (remember how in the 80′s, “reform” was all about removing market impediments? God, I miss the 80′s!,) and I’m guessing he’ll get some action in that area. Of course, poker machines would generally be a state issue, which is why Wilkie ever so helpfully suggested use of the Corporations Act – the Fed’s favourite tool for trouncing state’s rights. What this effectively means, is that an independent from Tasmania is laying down the law for NSW clubs and their patrons (all for the greater good, of course).

Just in case you were thinking this is a small enough price to pay, rest assured it’s just the tip of the iceberg. The new minority government (whichever side that might be) hasn’t even started legislating anything yet – all of the current “negotiations” are just for starters. I found the following to be a particularly ominous sign:

The trio (Gillard, Wilkie and Wilkie’s wife and media adviser, Kate Burton) then began talks over a jug of water and a thin black binder placed on a coffee table.

The binder looked identical to packages Ms Gillard handed recently to three other independent MPs which touted Labor’s record and election promises bearing on their electorates.

Welcome to the new paradigm.

UPDATE: Wilkie has now released his 20-point list of priorities. Delivering on these would cost billions – and that’s just for the dental plan. But most amusing was number 20, which basically asks for a bigger office:

Adequate staffing and office space to deal with the workload of an Independent Member of Parliament.

August 28, 2010 Posted by | General, Politics | , , | 7 Comments

Short and Sweet

There is still some confusion over short selling. This confusion leads people to support bans and restrictions on short selling which make very little sense. I think some of the concerns stem from simple misunderstandings and so I’m starting a public education campaign.

The simplest type of short sale is a forward sale agreement. If I enter a contract to sell a bicycle one week in the future I have made a short sale. If I own a bicycle at the time I enter the contract it is a ‘covered’ short sale. If I don’t own a bicycle at the time I enter the contract it is a ‘naked’ short sale.

Read more »

August 28, 2010 Posted by | General | 13 Comments

Making the buses run on time.

The following podcast is well worth listening to. It outlines how the government of Chile has destroyed a thriving privately operated public transport sector.

http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2010/08/munger_on_priva.html

In short Chile went from having an average commute time of 40minutes to having an average commute time of 1 hr and 40 minutes because the government took over the bus industry in 2007. Not only did they take over the industry but they changed drivers incentives. Now the buses are half empty, people can’t get on them, they take longer to get anywhere, congestion has increased as people have shifted to cars and taxis and where the industry once made a modest profit it now loses masses of money. Tragic.

August 28, 2010 Posted by | General | 1 Comment

The US commerce clause

In America, like Australia, the federal government has been intentionally mis-interpreting the constitution in order to take ever more powers from the State governments and the people. One of their main tricks is to mis-use the commerce clause. The intent of the clause was to prevent the different states of America from imposing trade restrictions on each other, but it is now used to regulate any activity of business. This extends to regulating growing of wheat on your own property for your own consumption. Reason TV tells the full story…

August 28, 2010 Posted by | Videos | , , | 5 Comments

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 99 other followers