Australian Libertarian Society

Thoughts on Freedom

The Terrorists Have Already Won

It is rare to find an issue that can unite libertarians, leftists, and conservatives in mutual outrage, but in the last week the U.S. Administration has succeeded in doing such a thing. Despite the brief “aww” moment of bipartisanship however, what I wish to make a few notes upon what is a morally odious practice that has received virtually no attention in the international media, yet one that has serious ramifications upon our freedoms. And one that if we are not careful, shall creep our way into Australia.

I am talking about the new security theatre regime installed by the Obama Administration at U.S. airports. As of last week, air travelers in the United States going through security screening at most modern airports have only two options: either go through a scanner that shall enable security personnel to – literally – see them naked, or be subjected to an “enhanced pat down” – one that is little different to the groping of a sexual pervert – one that, according to the Transport Security Agency guidelines, requires for the feeling up of travelers genitalia. And I am not exaggerating when I say that that is what occurs. The guidelines literally say this!

Now, as readers here will know, I have slightly more sympathy for pro-national security arguments than your average libertarian (what can I say, it’s the conservative bent in me J ) Yet this new policy strikes even me as perverse. For it will do nothing to increase security (I mean, come on, any terrorist will be able to find a way about the ban if they tried, and besides, these don’t even detect most weapons), and at the same time, it is a morally abhorrent violation of the rights of U.S. citizens. The whole charade of security theatre, and all the inefficient, costly measures that it has created that perhaps in the past I was willing to turn a blind eye to, has just gone waaaay too far. And don’t think, unless we act upon it, it can’t happen in Australia.

So. Let us get into the details. Under these new rules, travelers have a choice. They can either go through a scanner – one which numerous medical authorities have said have dangerous levels of radiation (Wired notes that “scientists have also expressed concern that radiation from the devices could have long-term health effects on travelers”.) – and one which  takes clear photos of them naked (yup, you can see just how  big their ‘junk’ is), or be subjected to a “pat down” – a euphemistic expression for a procedure in which TSA rules – and again, this isn’t hyperbole – demand agents feel the crotch of passengers (and, I ought mention, also thoroughly rub and examine  the breasts if they are female). Some commentators have gone so far to call it sexual molestation – and with some justification. Oh, and think you can opt out? Once you arrive at an airport, if you refuse the naked photography/groping – even if you choose not to board the plane – you can be fined $10,000

In anycase, if you choose the nudie-scanner approach, the images have been demonstrated to be able to be saved and leaked (just yesterday 35,000 images from a U.S. Marshall’s Office – images which were pledged to be erased after every screening –  were publicly released). Fortunately for those concerned, they were from an earlier generation of scanners, which are rather blurry. But yes, just wait till the full nudie-scanners hit the interwebs and be prepared to be a star!

So how’s this gone since introduction.

Let’s see. TSA agents have already been recorded putting their hands down people’s pants, cupping and squeezing a traveler’s breasts, and traumatizing children (watch this clip of a three year old girl being accosted and judge for yourself). There are already reports that  machines are being used to ogle women (one TSA operative was caught out saying “heads up, I’ve got a cutie). And you already have  proof of TSA officials  use the body scanners to make fun of people’s genitals and who pretend to find cocaine in passengers’ luggage as a prank,, and even TSA Agents proudly boasting “I am God”. There are even reports that TSA agents are – quite literally – putting their hands down people’s pants .

Consider this story from a grope-survivor:

“I said I didn’t want them to see me naked and the agent started yelling “Opt out- we have an opt here”. Another agent took me aside and said they would have to pat me down. He told me he was going to touch my genitals and asked if I wouldn’t rather just go through the scanner, that it would be less humiliating for me. I was in shock. I couldn’t believe this was happening. I kept saying I don’t want any of this to happen. I was whispering please don’t do this, please, please.”

Since Celeste didn’t agree to go through the scanner, the enhanced pat down began. “He started at one leg and then ran his hand up to my crotch. He cupped and patted my crotch with his palm. Other flyers were watching this happen to me. At that point I closed my eyes and started praying to the Goddess for strength. He also cupped and then squeezed my breasts. That wasn’t the worst part. He touched my face, he touched my hair, stroking me. That’s when I started crying. It was so intimate, so horrible. I feel like I was being raped. There’s no way I can fly again. I can’t do it.””

A good friend of mine was so traumatized from her experience last week she cancelled her trip home to visit her family for Thanksgiving. Indeed, in the last week I have spoken to about 10 people who have travelled by air since this has  come in. Ever single one – whether they chose the naked scanner, or the grope – have been traumatized. And I’m not talking about crazy anarcho-capitalist libertarians only here. I’m talking about your average American, forced to be humiliated by the state.

Of course, this has nothing to do with safety. The hours long wait at airports has already forced many to abandon air travel, and, as driving is proven to be more dangerous than flying,  by one estimate, enhanced security procedures after 9/11 led to 2,300 additional road deaths in two years..  It is simply about government exercising its power.

Now, at this point, some of you may be scratching your heads wondering “why on earth is the Obama Administration doing this”. To which I chuckle to myself and extract the following from the Washington Examiner:

“Rapiscan is one of the two companies that makes the nudie-scanners at airports for the TSA. Rapiscan CEO Deepak Chopra … recently was tapped by Obama to accompany the administration on Obama’s trip to India. Also, Chopra is an Obama donor.”

But of course, that’s not all: “Rapiscan got the other naked-scanner contract from the TSA, worth $173 million. Rapiscan’s lobbyists include Susan Carr, a former senior legislative aide to Rep. David Price, D-N.C., chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee.” Ah of course.

So this is where have have come to. The rights of citizens being trampelled upon due to a bootleggers-Baptist alliance of national-security fearmongers, and rent-seeking corporations. This is what our fear in the ‘war of terror’ has come to.  For good reason, the headline on the conservative Drudge Report (accompanied by a photo of a Catholic nun being felt-up by a TSA agent). read: The Terrorists Have Won. Because, if we have come to the stage where to board a plane you either have to be photographed naked, or groped by government operatives – when again there is no legitimate security requirement for this whatsoever, then we have a problem.

The only question is, what now Australia? For as the price of freedom is eternal vigilance, I worry if we ignore this travesty, the same thing may happen here. And that it shall become not a question of if, but when.

November 17, 2010 - Posted by | Civil liberties

21 Comments

  1. [...] posted at Thoughts on Freedom, the official blog of the Australian Libertarian Society that you all ought [...]

    Pingback by The Terrorists Have Already Won « The musings of an Australian classical liberal in Washington DC | November 17, 2010

  2. I’ve never understood why air travel is subject to more security than other public places. Why should I have to go through a metal detector to go onto a plane with 300 passengers but not into the MCG, a crowded beach or a shopping center? The search should be a condition of entry between the airline/airport and the passenger.

    Comment by Troy | November 17, 2010

  3. I’ve never understood why air travel is subject to more security than other public places.

    Part of the justification is no doubt the fact that airplanes have been found to be very effective.

    Ever single one – whether they chose the naked scanner, or the grope – have been traumatized.

    Sounds like a class action in the making.

    Thanks Tim for this article. I hadn’t realised what all the fuss was about. I find the laptop search and the hand scan for explosives really annoying but this does seem to be on a whole other level.

    Comment by TerjeP | November 18, 2010

  4. In my comment above the word “missiles” is suppose to appear after the word “effective”.

    Comment by TerjeP | November 18, 2010

  5. Rapey-scan

    Comment by Yobbo | November 18, 2010

  6. “I’ve never understood why air travel is subject to more security than other public places.” It is called 9/11 Troy. A plane is mobile the MCG isn’t. I do believe a pothead tried to fly a football stadium but it wouldn’t take off. Apparently, his Doritos weighed him down. Democrats blame George W. Bush.

    Comment by Ben | November 18, 2010

  7. How many planes have been hijacked since 9/11? Sincere question, I really don’t know. I can’t recall any though in almost 10 years.

    Don’t they lock all the cockpit doors now and won’t open them under any circumstances? So it’s near impossible for a terrorist to take control of the airplane.

    Comment by Troy | November 18, 2010

  8. http://johnnyedge.blogspot.com/2010/11/these-events-took-place-roughly-between.html

    A blog story of a guy that refused to be groped or nudie scanned.

    Comment by Shem Bennett | November 18, 2010

  9. Buses are mobile, but unfortunately I’ve never been felt up while boarding a bus.

    Comment by Shem Bennett | November 18, 2010

  10. Ron Paul on the matter: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwsdq69AHnw

    Comment by Tim Andrews | November 18, 2010

  11. Go Ron Paul. He does seem to be pretty on the money.

    Comment by TerjeP (say tay-a) | November 18, 2010

  12. NO, the terrorists have lost! This would-be terrorist was stopped before he could blow up a plane. He tries to say he is innocent, but wouldn’t any self-respecting terrorist say the same? I can’t help thinking that he protesteth two much!

    Comment by 'Nuke' Gray | November 18, 2010

  13. “I’ve never understood why air travel is subject to more security than other public places.”

    Actually, here in Atlanta Georgia, the crackdown in public places IS already happening. There have been numerous TSA security sweeps of our public Public transit. Also, our interstates have been snarled to “x-ray” all cargo vehicles.

    All of the Alphabet Federal agencies involved call these activities “training exercises”.

    Yes, as long as your country has intercourse with America, it is coming to your shores.

    Sorry.

    Comment by JT | November 18, 2010

  14. @terje – at least one person is suing for sexual assault

    http://www.ourlittlechatterboxes.com/2010/11/tsa-sexual-assault.html – a rather prominent (and totally apolitical) ‘mommy blogger’

    Comment by Tim Andrews | November 19, 2010

  15. Don’t just “opt out” of naked scanners only to be sexually molested/assaulted, instead. Boycott Flying COMPLETELY, until sanity returns! Please join us: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392

    Comment by Mark | November 19, 2010

  16. Idiot.

    Comment by Mary | November 19, 2010

  17. I like how resident muppet bible bashing conservative Ben Peter makes up some ludicrous story about pot smokers (ala babies being baked “Californian Cheeseburgers” at a *pot party*) in a lame attempt to ridicule questioning the myopic approach to flight security and preventative anti terrorist policing.

    Ben sez:

    Conservative Governments can do no wrong as long as you have some childish fable about pot smokers to cover up for their inept failures.

    Comment by . | November 19, 2010

  18. wise of you to realize that the control freaks will try and turn any and every country into a dictatorship of some sort.

    at tim andrews
    probably a waste of time since you know it’s probably going to get the “national security” smack down.

    Comment by anon | November 19, 2010

  19. [...] new security screenings at US airports, and how they amount to licensed groping-by-government, but Tim Andrews’s piece is the best I’ve read. This security caper is starting to get beyond silly: it’s invasive, expensive and (more to [...]

    Pingback by Skepticlawyer » Saturday chit-chat | November 20, 2010

  20. Meanwhile, back in the land of reality, the Israelis do it completely differently.

    Comment by Lorenzo from Oz | November 21, 2010

  21. [...] Andrews has already written a good post on this issue, The Terrorists have already won (I particularly like the title).  But I note that the ALS blog has been fairly quiet over the last [...]

    Pingback by Full body scanners coming to an airport near you. « Thoughts on Freedom | November 30, 2010


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 265 other followers

%d bloggers like this: